The best, quickest, easiest way to limit the fed is to use your lawful power of the purse and cut off its funding. Get educated on how to do this at LostHorizons.com. In a nutshell, several hundred thousand honest, law-abiding Americans have, over the last 18 years, secured over $2 billion in 100% refunds from the IRS and over 38 state…
The best, quickest, easiest way to limit the fed is to use your lawful power of the purse and cut off its funding. Get educated on how to do this at LostHorizons.com. In a nutshell, several hundred thousand honest, law-abiding Americans have, over the last 18 years, secured over $2 billion in 100% refunds from the IRS and over 38 state revenue agencies by simply distinguishing, in a legally meaningful manner, the difference between private sector earnings and federal income. One is protected from the indirect federal income excise tax, and the other is subject to it. The private sector did not start paying the federal income tax until the 1940s, when a program called "withholding at the source" was implemented to a willing publish enthralled with war fever. Prior to then, Abraham Lincon's income tax of July 1, 1862 was only applied to federal workers or those investing in federal railroads or otherwise received federal income. From 1913 to 1940, only about 4% of working, money-making Americans filed income tax returns, but after the private sector started paying into the system, the number of working Americans filing tax returns rose to over 90%. And this had nothing to do with how much they earned, but the fact that in the 1940s, private sector payroll departments started issuing 1099s, W-2s, and such information returns on the private sector. Virtually all of these are fraudulent, and 26 USC 7434 provides for civil damages for fraudulent information returns, because 26 USC 6051 requires that these information returns ONLY report "wages as defined" in sections 3121(a) and 3401(a), and those sections where "wages" is defined in the federal income tax code consist primarily of exceptions of the types of payments from federal employers to federal employees which are excempt from the definition of "wages". The term "wages" absolutely does not apply to payment from private sector companies to those who work for them. And, by rebutting these fraudulent W-2s and 1099s, informed Americans have for nearly two decades exercised their power of the purse and defunded the federal government. But it requires more than just a few hundred thousand Americans upholding the law and requiring the IRS to respect the limits of its taxing authority. There need to be several tens of millions of Americans informed and educated. Having the federal government and its department of education running school curriculums has been a disaster, preventing Americans of knowing this type of information that would put a limit to its power. Having enumerated powers in the Constitution is nearly meaningless if you provide it unlimited funds, and that's what we have done for nearly 80 years. Everyone reading this, please, do your part, go to the aforementioned website, peruse the Bulletin Board page and the tiny sampling of 100% refunds issued by the IRS and state governments all over the country. Get educated and do your part. Your country is just about gone if you don't pick up the tools that the Founders of this Constitutional Republic gave you and put those tools to use. It will be scary, but there are hundreds of thousands of folks before you who have reclaimed our inheritance provided for by this great document called the Constitution.
Brian, this comment goes beyond the scope of what my post is about, and I want everyone to understand that I do not endorse this approach. While I haven't done much research on this, I know that Irwin Schiff, Peter Schiff's father, was a staunch believer that the Federal Income Tax was illegal and he wrote many books about it. He may have been right, but he died in jail because of his views. If people follow your advice and stop paying taxes and then get arrested, are you going to bail them out? Are you going to take responsibility for their lost income, and legal expenses? We have to keep our priorities straight, and that means that we have to ensure that the Constitution is upheld and freedom is preserved, which will happen via the States and the people. There are ways to address the tax issue, but that is secondary to maintaining our freedom.
Hi Glenn, I apologize if I veered off topic more than you intended without tying my point more closely to your theme..
But if I may please respond, I would like to add that Mr. Hendrickson has very detailed pages dedicated to all the so called gurus out there like Mr. Schiff, and explains in detail why their arguments are incorrect. While Mr. Schiff believed the income tax code was unconstitutional, Mr. Hendrickson goes into great detail explaining why the federal income tax IS entirely lawful and constitutional as written (it is because of certain key terms and definitions, designed to fool the masses who don't read them, that it is constitutional, while making it largely benign for most people). Noone has gone to jail for upholding the letter and intent of the law by rebutting fraudulent W-2s and 1099s when they file their returns and force the IRS to provide 100% refunds. A handful have been harassed, with the IRS trying to intimidate them into changing their returns, but ultimately the IRS backs down and returns the overpayments. If enough people upheld the law and stopped the IRS from misapplying this equitable, fair, desirable income excise, then the feds would resort to direct taxes (which would be apportioned and make the fed dependent upon the states for funding) or they would rely on import tariffs, which have a free market limit. The result would be a return to the fed's inability to reach over the state governments directly into the pockets of citizens of the states and try to offer that money to the state governments with strings attached that would harm the citizens of those states. Without defunding the feds by massive adherence to the limits on the federal income tax, there is just no way the states will be able to kick out better funded feds. I respectfully request that you please invest at least ten minutes on the LostHorizons.com bulletin board page and peruse the correspondence between the IRS and those individuals to whom they furnished 100% refund checks posted. Back to your topic, I just received an ultimatum yesterday from Westinghouse to get an experimental gene therapy shot by December 8th or be terminated. The bottom line is because they see themselves as a federal contractor they are going to submit to Biden's executive order solely because they're afraid of losing hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funds to help them in their crony capitalism to unfairly compete in the global marketplace. Federal overreach and why they must be defunded if states are going to assert their rights.
The best, quickest, easiest way to limit the fed is to use your lawful power of the purse and cut off its funding. Get educated on how to do this at LostHorizons.com. In a nutshell, several hundred thousand honest, law-abiding Americans have, over the last 18 years, secured over $2 billion in 100% refunds from the IRS and over 38 state revenue agencies by simply distinguishing, in a legally meaningful manner, the difference between private sector earnings and federal income. One is protected from the indirect federal income excise tax, and the other is subject to it. The private sector did not start paying the federal income tax until the 1940s, when a program called "withholding at the source" was implemented to a willing publish enthralled with war fever. Prior to then, Abraham Lincon's income tax of July 1, 1862 was only applied to federal workers or those investing in federal railroads or otherwise received federal income. From 1913 to 1940, only about 4% of working, money-making Americans filed income tax returns, but after the private sector started paying into the system, the number of working Americans filing tax returns rose to over 90%. And this had nothing to do with how much they earned, but the fact that in the 1940s, private sector payroll departments started issuing 1099s, W-2s, and such information returns on the private sector. Virtually all of these are fraudulent, and 26 USC 7434 provides for civil damages for fraudulent information returns, because 26 USC 6051 requires that these information returns ONLY report "wages as defined" in sections 3121(a) and 3401(a), and those sections where "wages" is defined in the federal income tax code consist primarily of exceptions of the types of payments from federal employers to federal employees which are excempt from the definition of "wages". The term "wages" absolutely does not apply to payment from private sector companies to those who work for them. And, by rebutting these fraudulent W-2s and 1099s, informed Americans have for nearly two decades exercised their power of the purse and defunded the federal government. But it requires more than just a few hundred thousand Americans upholding the law and requiring the IRS to respect the limits of its taxing authority. There need to be several tens of millions of Americans informed and educated. Having the federal government and its department of education running school curriculums has been a disaster, preventing Americans of knowing this type of information that would put a limit to its power. Having enumerated powers in the Constitution is nearly meaningless if you provide it unlimited funds, and that's what we have done for nearly 80 years. Everyone reading this, please, do your part, go to the aforementioned website, peruse the Bulletin Board page and the tiny sampling of 100% refunds issued by the IRS and state governments all over the country. Get educated and do your part. Your country is just about gone if you don't pick up the tools that the Founders of this Constitutional Republic gave you and put those tools to use. It will be scary, but there are hundreds of thousands of folks before you who have reclaimed our inheritance provided for by this great document called the Constitution.
Brian, this comment goes beyond the scope of what my post is about, and I want everyone to understand that I do not endorse this approach. While I haven't done much research on this, I know that Irwin Schiff, Peter Schiff's father, was a staunch believer that the Federal Income Tax was illegal and he wrote many books about it. He may have been right, but he died in jail because of his views. If people follow your advice and stop paying taxes and then get arrested, are you going to bail them out? Are you going to take responsibility for their lost income, and legal expenses? We have to keep our priorities straight, and that means that we have to ensure that the Constitution is upheld and freedom is preserved, which will happen via the States and the people. There are ways to address the tax issue, but that is secondary to maintaining our freedom.
Hi Glenn, I apologize if I veered off topic more than you intended without tying my point more closely to your theme..
But if I may please respond, I would like to add that Mr. Hendrickson has very detailed pages dedicated to all the so called gurus out there like Mr. Schiff, and explains in detail why their arguments are incorrect. While Mr. Schiff believed the income tax code was unconstitutional, Mr. Hendrickson goes into great detail explaining why the federal income tax IS entirely lawful and constitutional as written (it is because of certain key terms and definitions, designed to fool the masses who don't read them, that it is constitutional, while making it largely benign for most people). Noone has gone to jail for upholding the letter and intent of the law by rebutting fraudulent W-2s and 1099s when they file their returns and force the IRS to provide 100% refunds. A handful have been harassed, with the IRS trying to intimidate them into changing their returns, but ultimately the IRS backs down and returns the overpayments. If enough people upheld the law and stopped the IRS from misapplying this equitable, fair, desirable income excise, then the feds would resort to direct taxes (which would be apportioned and make the fed dependent upon the states for funding) or they would rely on import tariffs, which have a free market limit. The result would be a return to the fed's inability to reach over the state governments directly into the pockets of citizens of the states and try to offer that money to the state governments with strings attached that would harm the citizens of those states. Without defunding the feds by massive adherence to the limits on the federal income tax, there is just no way the states will be able to kick out better funded feds. I respectfully request that you please invest at least ten minutes on the LostHorizons.com bulletin board page and peruse the correspondence between the IRS and those individuals to whom they furnished 100% refund checks posted. Back to your topic, I just received an ultimatum yesterday from Westinghouse to get an experimental gene therapy shot by December 8th or be terminated. The bottom line is because they see themselves as a federal contractor they are going to submit to Biden's executive order solely because they're afraid of losing hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funds to help them in their crony capitalism to unfairly compete in the global marketplace. Federal overreach and why they must be defunded if states are going to assert their rights.
Thanks Brian. I will look into it.